Feinberg, M., Kovacheff, C., Teper, R., & Inbar, Y. (in press). Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S.E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 251-256.
Eitan, O., Viganola, D., Inbar, Y., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Thau, S., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2018). Is research in social psychology politically biased? Systematic empirical tests and a forecasting survey to address the controversy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 188-199.
Kovacheff C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018). The problem with morality: Impeding progress and increasing divides. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12, 218-257.
Lelieveld, G. J., Inbar, Y., & van Dijk, E. (2018). Explaining reluctance to benefit from others’ misfortune. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 662-672.
Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., Wirz, C. D., Brossard, D., & Rozin, P. (2018). An overview of attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Annual Review of Nutrition, 38, 459-479.
Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2017). Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 383-412.
Evers, E. R. K., Inbar, Y., Blanken, I., & Oosterwijk, L. D. (2017). When do people prefer carrots to sticks? A robust "matching effect" in policy evaluation. Management Science, 63, 4261-4276.
Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., & Mallinas, S. R. (2016). Right-Wing Authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward "gay men and lesbians" and "homosexuals." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, e31-e45.
Inbar, Y. (2016). Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608676113
Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2016). Pathogens and politics: Current research and new questions. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 10, 365-374.
Inbar, Y., Westgate, E. C., Pizarro D. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Can a naturally occurring pathogen threat change social attitudes? Evaluations of gay men and lesbians during the 2014 Ebola epidemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 420-427.
Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2016). Evidence for absolute moral opposition to genetically modified food in the United States. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 315-324. [Supplementary Material] [A critical commentary] [Our response]
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., et al. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 12408-12413.
Brenner, C. J., & Inbar, Y. (2015). Disgust sensitivity predicts political ideology and policy attitudes in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 27-38.
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., & Inbar, Y. (2015). Explanatory Judgment, moral offense and value-free science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1-21.
Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2015). Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology [Peer commentary on "Political diversity will improve social psychological science" by J. L. Duarte et al.], Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 29-30.
Tybur, J.M., Inbar, Y., Molho, C., & Güler, E. (2015). Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies? Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 489-497.
Tybur, J.M., Inbar, Y., Güler, E., & Molho, C. (2015). Pathogen disgust requires no defense: a response to Shook, Terrizzi, Clay, & Oosterhoff (2015). [Commentary on "In defense of pathogen disgust and disease avoidance: a response to Tybur et al. (2015)" by N. J. Shook et al.]. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 502-504.
Crawford, J., Inbar, Y., & Maloney, V. (2014). Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 218-223.
Evers, E. R. K., Inbar, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. (2014). Set-fit effects in choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 504-509.
Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2014). Disgust, politics, and responses to threat [Peer commentary on "Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology" by J. R. Hibbing, K. B. Smith, & J. R. Alford]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 315-316.
Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2014). Pollution and purity in moral and political judgment. In J. Wright and H. Sarkissian (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology: Affect, Character, and Commitments (pp. 111-129). Continuum Press.
Avramova, Y. R., & Inbar, Y. (2013). Emotion and moral judgment. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 169-178.
Critcher, C. R., Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2013). How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 308-315
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Gilovich, T., & Ariely, D. (2013). Moral masochism: On the connection between guilt and self-punishment. Emotion, 13, 14-18.
Van Wolferen, J., Inbar, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. (2013). Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 44-53.
Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496-503.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2012). Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion, 12, 23-27.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Cushman, F. (2012). Benefiting from misfortune: when harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 52-62.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 537-544.
Carnevale, J. J., Inbar, Y., & Lerner, J. S. (2011). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 274-278.
Inbar, Y., Botti, S., & Hanko, K. (2011). Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 533-540.
Inbar, Y., & Gilovich, T. (2011). Angry, but adjusting? The effect of specific emotions on adjustment from self-generated anchors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 563-569.
Pizarro, D. A., Inbar, Y., & Helion, C. (2011). On disgust and moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 267-268.
Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). People’s intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 232-247.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 714-725.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9, 435-439.